Re: Sending attachments

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:12:57 +0900
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >> As has been pointed out, message-mode has more features than mail-mode.
> >
> > Yes.  And Gnus has much more features than Rmail.  So what?  We all do
> > agree that much more features means more complexity in setting things
> > up.  Why impose that on people who are happy with simple modes?
> 
> How, exactly, is message-mode an "imposition" on "people who are happy
> with simple modes"?

If you insist on everyone switching to message-mode and making
mail-mode obsolete, you are imposing message-mode on them.

> Please, please, somebody who asserts that mail-mode is necessary, give
> some concrete examples as to _why_.

Maybe someone else will.  This old fart simply doesn't want to learn a
new mode unless it's absolutely necessary.  Is this so hard to
understand?