[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Language identification
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Language identification |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:01:38 -0400 |
> Also there are conflicting extensions like e.g. ".pl" for both
> Perl and Prolog (esp. SWI-Prolog).
That's indeed an interesting case, where content-based mode choice might
make sense. Thanks for reminding me of it.
I'd prefer a very specific feature for choosing between these two
languages to use of a general mechanism. The specific feature
would probably be more reliable, and people would not be tempted
to use it for other issues where it is not the right approach.
But it would be even better to convince people to use distinct
extensions.
- Re: Language identification, (continued)
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/28
- Re: Language identification, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
- Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Language identification, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/28
- Re: Language identification,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
- Re: Language identification, David Kastrup, 2009/08/31
- Re: Language identification, Jan D., 2009/08/31
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
Re: Language identification, Alex Ott, 2009/08/28
Re: Language identification, Alex Ott, 2009/08/28