[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:22:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Tom,
> Tassilo> So when I run emacs 22, package.el would show version 0.8 of
> Tassilo> my-package, with emacs 23 it would show version 1.0, and with
> Tassilo> emacs 21 it wouldn't be shown as not installable.
>
> I didn't do this, either. I think few people bounce between Emacs
> versions this way.
The problem is not that people frequently switch versions, but that some
distros like RedHat Enterprise Linux still ship with Emacs 21. For
example org-mode dropped emacs 21 support at 6.27, so version 6.26
should be displayed in package.el running in emacs 21, although the
newest version is 6.30.
Bye,
Tassilo
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Bob Rogers, 2009/09/18
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/19
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric Schulte, 2009/09/13
Re: Emacs Package Management, Stephen Eilert, 2009/09/16