[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:43:59 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The way most distros seems to solve this is to simply have different
>> repos for different distro versions. That should work for package.el
>> also. We could even adopt the stable/testing/bleeding scheme, so 3
>> repos for every supported major emacs version.
>
> I don't think that's a good approach, because it requires a lot of
> maintenance and testing on the package repository side. It would be
> better if a package could specify something like
>
> (package "my-package"
> (version "1.0")
> (need ">=emacs-23"))
>
> (package "my-package"
> (version "0.8")
> (need ">=emacs-22.1" "<emacs-23"))
>
> and package.el does the resolving.
I agree, but I also think it should match against development sources
checkout date.
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Bob Rogers, 2009/09/18
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/19
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric Schulte, 2009/09/13
Re: Emacs Package Management, Stephen Eilert, 2009/09/16