[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:30:00 +0200 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:59:20 +0900
>
> So I suspect you'd get resistence to such a suggestion, both on
> principle ("The log message is part of history") and practically
> ("there's no real benefit, it would take work to do, and it slightly
> weakens our internal consistency guarantee").
Forget it. It's easier to set up flyspell for the log buffers.
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, (continued)
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Teemu Likonen, 2010/01/01
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/01
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/02
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Miles Bader, 2010/01/02
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/02
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Miles Bader, 2010/01/02
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/02
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/05
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/01
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/01
- Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/01
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/01
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/02
Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/02