[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Ken Raeburn |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:07:47 -0500 |
On Mar 9, 2010, at 11:22, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Make sure you check out the emacs-mt work too at
> http://gitorious.org/emacs-mt as that's (AFAIK) the closest to getting
> into Emacs. Giuseppe Scrivano has done great work.
Ah, yes, I thought I might be forgetting someone. (Sorry!)
So many to keep track of... that's a *good* thing! :-)
> Have you considered continuations support? I didn't see mention of them
> in the docs.
Not even remotely, no. :-) I'm not particularly familiar with continuations in
Scheme, let alone how you'd map that into elisp, or if the Lisp world has a
similar construct....
Ken
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Chad Brown, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Ken Raeburn <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Johan Bockgård, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/06
Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Christoph, 2010/03/13