[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next emacs version?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: next emacs version? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:11:44 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:23:03 -0700
>
> If this change had
> been made in a 23.0.50.1 dev version (or whatever the nomenclature is), then
> some such dev versions would have the change and some would not.
If you want to support development versions, then indeed the version
number is not an unequivocal indicator of a change.
- Re: next emacs version?, (continued)
- RE: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- Re: next emacs version?, Miles Bader, 2010/03/23
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/23
- Re: next emacs version?, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/21
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/22
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/22