[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:25:22 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.7.lanl7 |
>> (mutex-lock MUTEX)
>> Acquire a mutex. If already held by this thread, returns.
>
> I.e. it's a "recursive/reentrant mutex".
Hmm -- is it fully recursive, where you must unlock it as many times as
you locked it? (I don't much care for the semi-recursive kind where one
unlock is sufficient regardless of the number of lock operations...)
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Re: Concurrency (was: redisplay system of emacs), (continued)
- Re: Concurrency (was: redisplay system of emacs), Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/05
- Re: Concurrency (was: redisplay system of emacs), Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/11
- Re: Concurrency (was: redisplay system of emacs), Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/25
- Re: Concurrency, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/26
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency,
Davis Herring <=
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29