[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:16:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Also, I think mutex-unlock should throw some kind of error if the mutex
> is owned by a different thread. What do you think of that?
That doesn't sound useful. There are perfectly valid ways to use mutexes
where the locker and the unlocker are not the same thread.
Stefan
- Re: Concurrency, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Davis Herring, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Daniel Colascione, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28