[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:18:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel> It really shouldn't be recursive at all:
Daniel> http://www.zaval.org/resources/library/butenhof1.html
My experience with Java is that recursive mutexes are pretty convenient,
and in practice don't cause any actual problems. I think most of this
paper is cutely worded but basically wrong.
I'm sure in the end it won't matter though. If you really want
non-recursive mutexes, somebody else can reinvent them in elisp.
Tom
- Re: Concurrency, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Daniel Colascione, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- gsoc for concurrent Emacs? (was: Concurrency), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/31
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Daniel Colascione, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28