[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next pretest
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Next pretest |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:41:07 +0300 |
> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:48:22 +0200
> Cc: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>, Sean Sieger <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> > And pretest binaries should correspond to the pretest source code exactly.
> > Otherwise, we can be comparing apples and oranges (which can mean confusion
> > and
> > more work for everyone involved).
>
>
> Thanks. I am including a file with something like this now:
>
> ;; bzr checkout info for Emacs unpatched version
> (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revision-id
> "address@hidden")
> (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revno 99712)
> (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-date "2010-03-21 12:57:49 +0100")
> (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-branch-nick "trunk")
This is a trunk checkout, whereas Drew (see above) wants a pretest
binary, which should be built from the emacs-23 branch.
Re: Next pretest, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/28
Re: Next pretest, Glenn Morris, 2010/03/29