[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:09:55 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:27, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> The problem is that a large value of `scroll-conservatively'
> is an undocumented feature, so maybe it is not recommended?
It is "documented", sort of, in a roundabout way, via `scroll-step':
scroll-step is a variable defined in `C source code'.
Its value is 0
Documentation:
*The number of lines to try scrolling a window by when point moves out.
If that fails to bring point back on frame, point is centered instead.
If this is zero, point is always centered after it moves off frame.
If you want scrolling to always be a line at a time, you should set
`scroll-conservatively' to a large value rather than set this to 1.
Juanma
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, (continued)
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, David Engster, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, David Engster, 2010/06/16
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/15
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption,
Juanma Barranquero <=
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, grischka, 2010/06/18
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, grischka, 2010/06/25