[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
grischka |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:36:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
This is unnecesary. The Windows event loop coded into Emacs already
receives Alt-F4 in a single event. What is needed is to determine from
that event loop if there is a binding for Alt-F4 (created with *-set-key
etc). Once we know that there is no such binding, it is trivial to send
back the Alt-F4 event back to Windows.
Well, it would be difficult to determine on the Windows level whether
the single keystroke was maybe part of C-x M-f4 or C-h M-f4. So in
any case it is better to reuse emacs central event parser.
To make some suggestion that could work: Store the key-code in a
variable like this:
case WM_SYSKEYDOWN:
last_syskey_code = wParam;
...
define keys emacs-wise like this:
(global-set-key [M-f4] 'w32-syskey)
with
DEFUN w32_syskey() {
PostMessage(frame_wnd, WM_EMACS_SYSKEY, last_syskey_code, 0);
}
and in wnd_proc()
case WM_EMACS_SYSKEY:
return DefWindowProc(hwnd, WM_SYSKEYDOWN, wParam, 0);
All untested. Also note that for Alt-<letter> keys, WM_SYSCHAR needs
to be handled as well.
--- grischka
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/17
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
grischka <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/20
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18