[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:40:54 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> wrote:
> Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>>> (global-set-key [M-f4] 'w32-syskey)
>>
>> Please don't forget that it is Alt+F4 we have been discussing, not M-f4.
>
> Please educate me: why is that important? where it makes a difference?
You can have another key than Alt as Emacs META. I use the w32 windows
key as Emacs META, since this makes it much easier to reach the menus.
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18