[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:39:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "."
>> "./.." "./../.."
> We're miscommunicating: the original report showed the error to be the
> lack of install-sh and doesn't mention automake. So the missing rule is
> to call autogen.sh or autoreconf or something when install-sh
> is missing.
(autogen.sh calls autoreconf which calls automake to add the files)
Well, there's nothing to be done about it now. Any new make rule would
only take effect after running configure, and anyone who can run
configure does not need such a rule. Anyone would ran autogen.sh between
~ Mar 20 and 25 should simply run it again if they have this issue.
- Re: A better autogen.sh, (continued)
Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], chad, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/03/29
Re: A better autogen.sh, chad, 2011/03/29
Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/30
Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/30
Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/30