[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New build process?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: New build process? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:54:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> a typo - their quite common you know. Context usually helps to
>>>> recognize them. In this case, autogen is probably the most likely
>>>> candidate :)
>>>
>>> What has autogen to do with emacs?
>>>
>>
>> autogen.sh then if you must be pedantic about it,
>
> You wrote: "Previously, you ran autoget and now you run ./autogen.sh"
> (with typo fixed), now you claim: "Previously, you ran autogen.sh and
> now you run ./autogen.sh".
>
> That does not make sense to me.
And it is not what he has written at all. Make it a habit to use copy
and paste when putting quote marks around something which you attribute
to a different source.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: New build process?, (continued)
- Re: New build process?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: New build process?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: New build process?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/26
Re: New build process?, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/07/26