[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:52:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> There's a certain conflict here between two groups of users: those who
> set pop-up-frames non-nil, and those who don't. The former want the
> current default, while most of the latter I suspect would want the
> previous behavior, maybe out of habit, maybe for some other reason.
I think that's a good analysis of the situation. I have `pop-up-frames'
nil, and I just create two frames at startup. I never add or delete any
frames. Having the second frame disappear, seemingly at random, puts a
serious crimp in my work flow.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, (continued)
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Chong Yidong, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Chong Yidong, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Andy Moreton, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/13
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Rasmus, 2011/09/10
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/09/10