[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:01:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> Good idea, but I think `window-combination-limit' fits existing Emacs
> terminology better. We could let a value of `t' have the binary window
> tree behavior for now, and defer numerical values for post-release.
Also I think `window-splits' is a bad name too. It's vague
and provides no hint of its purpose. Would it be possible
to find a better name that mentions `combination'? Such as e.g.
`window-combination-resize' or `window-combination-balance'?
- Re: Windows' "split status", (continued)
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status",
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/17