Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> that's because you write it wrong:
>
>   (< 0 (1+ (foo-thing-that-computes-something)))
> aka
>   (< -1 (foo-thing-that-computes-something))

By all that's holy!  (I.e. Emacs!)  That's just wrong!

I mean, really.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no  *  Sent from my Rome