[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:41:51 -0500 |
> Thanks! I have just one question: can we, instead of aborting on
> EAGAIN, retry a few times? My suggestion is below.
That would make sense, I guess. I have no idea whether EAGAIN is a
common situation to be in when doing writes on a functioning network,
though.
EAGAIN is defined to mean that a system call was interrupted and the
program should try again.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
- gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/11
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/11
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/12
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/12
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Tom Tromey, 2012/02/13
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Andreas Schwab, 2012/02/13
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: gnutls infloop possibly fixed, Andreas Schwab, 2012/02/13