Re: CL package suggestion

[Stefan Monnier]

> Maybe cl-runtime, or cl-rt?

I'd rather not insist on the "runtime" side.  It will just be the new
canonical name of "cl".  We can't use "cl" because too many package
presume an implementation of "cl" which is not namespace clean, whereas
the new "cl" will be namespace-clean.

Maybe 'cl-clean' ?


        Stefan


> We need a (require 'cl-<something>) which brings up CL but only within
>> the "cl-" namespace.  I don't have a good idea for naming.  `cl-defs'
>> might be OK, but I'm open to other suggestions.  Maybe `cl-layer', or
>> `cl-emu', or `cl-compat'?
>> `cl-funs' is another option, indeed.
>>