[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: company.el status?
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: company.el status? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:28:53 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 27.03.2013 6:56, Tim Cross wrote:
My question as well. While I won't lose any sleep should we give up on
bzr and move to git, I am very concerned regarding further fracturing of
the emacs ecosystem if that means using a platform which is using
non-free tools. Git != GitHub.
I believe I presented some reasons why a project might want to use
GitHub over hosting solely at gnu.org.
> Lets have all official emacs packages use
git, but on gnu.org <http://gnu.org>. If we start moving things out to
various other locations, before long, we will have forks and different
Forks are good, the power to create one is one of the main freedoms
provided by free software licenses.
If a project has people taking its code and running in different
directions, it means the project is in demand, and it increases the
probability that those people either contribute back, or maybe create
something newer and more exciting.
versions all over the place, leaving an envrionment where only the
determined and experienced emacser has any hope - all new users will run
a mile.
As long as GNU ELPA is easy to contribute to and the project maintainer
is willing, there shouldn't be any problems.
Now, if you're actually using the package, how about contributing some
code? I'm currently the sole developer, and I'm not in any danger of
splitting into several people anytime soon.
--Dmitry
- Re: company.el status?, (continued)
- Re: company.el status?, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2013/03/07
- Re: company.el status?, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/07
- Re: company.el status?, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2013/03/08
- Re: company.el status?, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/08
- Re: company.el status?, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/08
- Re: company.el status?, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/08
- Message not available
- Re: company.el status?, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/08
- Re: company.el status?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/09
- Re: company.el status?, Tim Cross, 2013/03/26
- Re: company.el status?,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: company.el status?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: company.el status?, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/09
- Re: company.el status?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/08
- Re: company.el status?, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/09
- Re: company.el status?, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2013/03/09