[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new name for the state of a set of frames?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: A new name for the state of a set of frames? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:44:03 +0200 |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33 AM, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd use "sframes" where "s" would stand for "serializable" or
> "serialized".
I think "sframe" does not pass the euphony test, and has the problem
that "sframe" suggests a single frame, and "sframes" is an odd plural
name for a single object. We'd have to go with sframe-list or
sframe-group or sframes-state, and then we're back were we started.
J