[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:33:30 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:02:22 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
>
> Given that we're now requiring GNU Make, I expect there's a lot of other
> stuff
> we could now move out of 'configure', if we had the time. Which would be a
> good
> thing: 'configure' is reaaally slow and is a pain to maintain. The smaller
> it
> is, the better.
I'm fine with that, but let's try to be more consistent about that
than we are now, and let's also record that somewhere in admin/notes.
The fact that I was surprised is probably an indication that others
might be, too.
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17