[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UI inconveniences with M-.
From: |
Helmut Eller |
Subject: |
Re: UI inconveniences with M-. |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:10:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, Apr 28 2015, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> [ Moving this to emacs-devel. ]
>
>>> > Emacs 24 also had "C-u M-." to go to the next one. This one doesn't;
>>> > moreover, if you try "C-u M-.", you get prompted for the symbol again,
>>> > and if you type the same one, you get nowhere. The other matches are
>>> > only available via completion, see below.
I my proposal the next-error/prev-error commands could be used to
navigate through xrefs even after the *xref* buffer disappeared. This
can was done--quite elegantly I think--by setting next-error-last-buffer
to the *xref* buffer and set the buffer local value of
next-error-function in the *xref* buffer appropriately.
Dmitry took that out because he thinks that it interferes too much with
compilation-mode. Maybe he's right but let me note that M-x rgrep also
uses next-error/prev-error and similarly interferes with
compilation-mode.
Helmut
- Re: UI inconveniences with M-., Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28
- Re: UI inconveniences with M-.,
Helmut Eller <=
- conflicting uses of next-error-function (was: UI inconveniences with M-.), Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/30
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/30
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/30
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29