[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion"
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion" |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:44:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> (Or at least the ones that have been marked as such, but that's pretty
> much all of them...)
That is not true. I thought little elves were tagging bug reports
containing patches, but that doesn't seem to happen as often as I
assume. As an experiment, I went through the newest 80 open bug reports
that were not tagged as "patch" and looked whether they, indeed, didn't
have any (seemingly workable) patches. And 8 of them did, as far as I
could judge (very quickly).
Would a command like `M-x debbugs-gnu-mark-as-patch' help? It could
look for something like a bug number on the current line and then mark
the report as having a patch, and should work in all Emacs mail readers?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", John Wiegley, 2016/04/25
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion",
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Andreas Röhler, 2016/04/26
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", John Wiegley, 2016/04/26
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Nicolas Petton, 2016/04/26
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/26
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", John Wiegley, 2016/04/26
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/27
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/27
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Nicolas Petton, 2016/04/27
- Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/27
Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion", Philipp Stephani, 2016/04/28