[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Mac port
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Mac port |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Sep 2016 20:19:07 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:06:29 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > I'm asking why it is wrong to do that in newer versions, as long as
> > frame-resize-pixelwise is nil.
>
> Because we want to give users a nice experience, by default.
So basically, no matter what is the value of frame-resize-pixelwise,
we behave the same on Windows? If so, I think we deprive users of the
flexibility to experience the other behavior, however unimportant it
may seem, and that is IMO a pity.
> >> Look up `frame-resize-pixelwise' in the Elisp manual.
> >
> > But frame resizing by dragging by a mouse is a user-visible feature,
> > not only for Lisp programmers.
>
> Why bother users
Because that's what manuals are about: bothering users with the
details of how the software works. Those who don't want to read,
don't have to.
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/19
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/09/18
- Re: Emacs Mac port, martin rudalics, 2016/09/19
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/09/19