[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:12:37 +0300 |
> From: Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 02:31:30 +0900 (JST)
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I) Add optional argument in 6) unflag-p to behave as the others.
> II) Add a new command `dired-mark-or-unmark-extension', as
> `dired-mark-extension' but, in interactive calls:
> * A prefix argument _unmark_ files.
> I propose to rebind '* .' to this command instead of the
> `dired-mark-extension'.
> After I) and II) we have an uniform behaviour for all
> commands marking files which are bound to keys. Powerful and easy
> to remember.
I'm okay with that proposal, but please leave the "* ." key sequence
at its present binding. For the new dired-mark-or-unmark-extension
command, I can propose "* e" or "* x", which are not yet taken, both
of them mnemonically resembling "EXtension".
Thanks.
- Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- RE: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Drew Adams, 2016/09/24
- RE: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/25