[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:39:07 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:31:09 +0200
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> There is no need for dired-mark-or-unmark-extension,
> dired-mark-extension should to that already. Since the prefix argument
> has always been useless it is ok to change its meaning, and make it
> consistent with all other dired commands.
I disagree and object to such a change.
- Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- RE: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Drew Adams, 2016/09/24
- RE: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/26