[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n/l10n summary
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: i18n/l10n summary |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 11:12:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Jun 03 2017, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> diff --git a/doc/lispref/strings.texi b/doc/lispref/strings.texi
> index e80e778..f365c80 100644
> --- a/doc/lispref/strings.texi
> +++ b/doc/lispref/strings.texi
> @@ -965,9 +965,10 @@ Formatting Strings
> decimal number immediately after the initial @samp{%}, followed by a
> literal dollar sign @samp{$}. It causes the format specification to
> convert the argument with the given number instead of the next
> -argument. Field numbers start at 1. A format can contain either
> -numbered or unnumbered format specifications but not both, except that
> address@hidden can be mixed with numbered specifications.
> +argument. Field numbers start at 1. A field number should differ
> +from the other field numbers in the same format.
printf allows using an argument multiple times, Emacs should do as well.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/02
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/03
- Re: i18n/l10n summary,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/03
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/04
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/04
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/04