[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n/l10n summary
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: i18n/l10n summary |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:45:10 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:54:31 -0700
>
> However, on my platform those fixes slowed down a microbenchmark (format
> "%d %s %c" 3 "def" ?‘) by 7%, so I installed the attached further patch,
> which
> recovered the performance loss for me.
Would it make sense to start collecting all those benchmarks, e.g.
somewhere under test/, so that in due time we will have a sound
body of code to make sure we don't lose performance during
development?
TIA
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/02
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/03
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Andreas Schwab, 2017/06/03
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Philipp Stephani, 2017/06/03
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/04
- Re: i18n/l10n summary,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/04