Re: [ELPA] New package: xr

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:37:15 -0500
> 
>   > Would it suffice (in addition to a copyright assignment, of course) if
>   > the files in GNU ELPA contain this sentence?
> 
>   >   This file is part of GNU Emacs.
> 
>   > Currently, some do but many don't.
> 
> IANAL, but I think that all of the source files in ELPA should have
> the standard license notice, including saying "part of GNU Emacs" --
> if for legal purposes we consider it part of GNU Emacs.

Would doing that in the source file be enough to serve as a legal
statement that the Emacs copyright assignment covers the package?  Or
will something else be required?