Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Noam Postavsky]

On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 05:49, Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Noam Postavsky <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I think this could have the unwanted side-effect of "polluting" the
> > Emacs session which runs the compiler with the obsolete function info
> > from the files it's compiling.
>
> That's true, but does it matter?

Not sure, but after spending time on preventing defsetf from defining
things in the compiler's Emacs session[1], I would feel bad about
letting this one through ;)

[1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/27016

> (defun foo ()
>   (with-suppressed-warnings (obsolete foo)
>     ...))
>
> That seems like a rather drastic way of doing it, I think?

Why do you say that?