[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:54:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>>>
>>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
>>
>> I agree. We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
>> from latex-proper classes. This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
>> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
>>
>> It’s a "relaxed" mode. I’m not sure what a good term for this is.
>
> Trial mode?
The latex flag would be "-interaction=nonstopmode". Probably a similar
flag exits in GCC.
The Knitr option is simply called error ∈ {TRUE, FALSE}.
I like nonstopmode, but I don’t care particularly for the "interaction"
classification.
Rasmus
--
Governments should be afraid of their people
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Thomas S . Dye, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric S Fraga, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nick Dokos, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/10
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/11
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/10/09