[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:07:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Thursday, 8 Oct 2015 at 19:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I think I will go with the straight to the point
>>> `org-export-barf-on-invalid-link' variable.
>>>
>>> However, not sure about the OPTIONS item.
>>>
>>> #+OPTIONS: ???:t
>>
>> #+options: barf:t
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> More seriously, I'm a big fan of longer is better if more clear so how
>> about "invalidlinksok:t" or "allowdanglinglinks:t" or some variation
>> thereof?
>
> Can option names contain dashes?
> If so, combine these two ideas to make a name as similar as possible
> to the variable name:
>
> #+options: barf-on-invalid-link:t
While I agree that options such as 't:·', '^:·', 'h:·' are bad, I think
'barf:·' is nice. It's short and precise, much like 'num:·'.
Something like 'barf-on-invalid-link' is very easy to mistype or forget.
And yes, I mostly type options by hand.
Rasmus
--
Got mashed potatoes. Ain't got no T-Bone. No T-Bone
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Thomas S . Dye, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric S Fraga, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nick Dokos, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/10
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/11
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/10/09