[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new toolbar icons are problematic
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: new toolbar icons are problematic |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:34:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 03:21:06PM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> > What do you mean "doesn't support transparency"? It's necessary to
> > have at least a simple "show background" color, because the toolbar
> > color is not a guaranteed constant.
>
> It wasn't necessary before gtk support; the heuristic worked well. I
> didn't know gtk required it.
I don't understand what you mean. Non-Gtk emacs toolbars also require at
least simple `one color' transparency for proper icon display -- that is, the
ability to adapt the background color based on the toolbar color. I can't
figure out whether you're talking about something more complicated than that
or not.
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- new toolbar icons are problematic, Dave Love, 2004/06/04
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/05
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Jan D., 2004/06/11
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Dave Love, 2004/06/11
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Jan D., 2004/06/11
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Dave Love, 2004/06/21
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Jan D., 2004/06/23
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Dave Love, 2004/06/24
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: new toolbar icons are problematic, Dave Love, 2004/06/11