[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Help! Planner is taking over my emacs!
From: |
Seth Falcon |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Help! Planner is taking over my emacs! |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:40:00 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) |
On 1 Jul 2005, address@hidden wrote:
> That looks like an excellent way to do it. Glad you found a way that
> works nicely! =) Is this something we should make the default?
I'm not sure if it should be the default or not, but it would be nice
if there was an option, I guess in planner-trunk.el, that toggles
whether or not the "trunking" happens automatically or not.
It _can_ be disconcerting to see tasks "vanish". With my current
setup, if I C-c C-x a task, it gets trunked to the bottom (and out of
sight) instantly; the effect is of it disappearing. Keeps things
organized, but you lose a little psychological satisfaction of seeing
the crossed-out task ;-)
Question:
I have planner-tasks-file-behavior set to 'close. What I like about
this is that I don't have to worry about unsaved buffers that I didn't
even know where open. If Emacs crashes, I lose less info (or less
time trying to sort out the recovery).
But this means task actions on my current buffer result in an an
automatic save. This is a bit aggresive. I would like the
auto-saving of buffers _except_ for my current planner buffer. Does
that make any sense? Is there a reasonable way to achieve this?
Hmm, I just found planner-save-buffers. Maybe I should go back to
p-t-f-b set to nil and just get in the habit of calling p-s-b...
+ seth