[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Muse-wiki milestone reached

[drkm]

"A.J. Rossini" writes:

> I agree in theory -- but in practice, you need some means to have as 
> dense a markup for context as possible, which is difficult.

> For planner, it's not too hard to imagine (start with ical/vcal and
> xml'ized versions), but for general output (I have grand plans for
> muse) I'd like to have means to simplify the output.

> That's the catch, isn't it -- simply extensible markup, which we can
> edit simply but describes and transforms into complex documents.  And
> I'm using the word "documents" extremely loosely.

  I don't understand.  I guess you can blame my poor English.
Sorry.  Can you reformulate, please?

  Thanks, and my apologies for the disturbance,

--drkm