On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:02 PM,
<address@hidden> wrote:
Send Fab-user mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Fab-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's available on
pypi only at 0.1.1?) (Jeff Forcier)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:53:26 -0400
From: Jeff Forcier <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Fab-user] On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's
available on pypi only at 0.1.1?)
To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Cc: fab-user <address@hidden>
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:29 PM, address@hidden
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I quickly walked through and it looks like you reorganized a bit, and folded
> up some overly detailed outlines that used to take up lots of space and just
> let'em expand 1 level deep. Much cleaner though it's always hard to know
> how much to show.
Thanks, that's basically what I was going for. It's still nowhere near
perfect but I think it should be a bit easier to navigate and read
than the first draft stuff was. Just need to redo the tutorial now,
thinking something pretty short as the 2nd draft of that was still
really long.
> Hey, did you ever get the generic "with prefix()" context manager in there
> that you mentioned
> (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1180411/activate-a-virtualenv-via-fabric-as-deploy-user)?
No, but there's a ticket for it: http://code.fabfile.org/issues/show/23
I've been trying to avoid anything but 0.9 bugfixes and doc work,
since I kept meaning to release, and now that an actual release is
imminent and the docs are done I can finally go back to a normal
code-oriented workflow -- meaning hitting up some of these feature
tickets.
They'll probably show up in master only -- I have to rethink my
release strategy a little (would kinda like to avoid 1.0 following 0.9
too closely, especially given how long people had to wait for 0.9) but
in general I do want 0.9.x to be nothing but bugfixes, and to have a
semi-rapid 0.9 => 1.0 => 1.1 => etc etc sort of release cycle. Will
spend more mental cycles on this after 0.9 is released and any kinks
are sorted out there.
-Jeff
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fab-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
End of Fab-user Digest, Vol 21, Issue 10
****************************************