[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request
From: |
tps12 |
Subject: |
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:28:56 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Desired Username wrote:
> 1) I think the registering many accounts problem can
> be solved by requiring a minimum amount of games
> played in order to gojofy. Not games won, just games
> played (to completion, resignations don't count
> towards this).
This would mean that new members could be jerks if they made sure to only
offend other new members. Not that it wouldn't work, but again it suggests
a flaw in gojo.
> 2) When you gojohit someone, you can still see them
> talking, they (and you) are just incrementally more
> likely to be banned. If you are being stalked, that's
> not enough. You want to be able to censor if you
> don't have the emotional strength to simply ignore.
> Or if you just don't like someone but don't want them
> banned from a room or game.
Right, the idea being that if the community as a whole doesn't have a
problem with the stalker, then the stalkee is just being whiny.
- [Fgs-bs] FEETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] FEETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request,
tps12 <=
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/07
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/07
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/07