Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH 0/9] autotools updates

[Antonio Ospite]

On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:40:30 +0100
David Henningsson <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2014-10-31 21:48, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > On Wed,  8 Oct 2014 16:08:16 +0200
> > Antonio Ospite <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was checking out the code to see if a certain memleak was fixed
> >> (https://sourceforge.net/p/fluidsynth/tickets/132/) and I ended up
> >> cleaning up the autotools infrastructure a bit.
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to check if this series of 9 patches made it to the list
> > at all, I can see the messages in the archive:
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2014-10/threads.html
> > but I may have actually sent the emails before I confirmed the
> > subscription to the list.
> >
> > So, were 9 patches from address@hidden delivered to the mailing list on
> > Oct 8th?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to reply to these patch set.
> 
> So, autotools is deprecated because we have switched over to cmake. I 
> was thinking of dropping it completely, but since you're sending this 
> patch set seems to indicate that you - and perhaps others - still depend 
> on autotools.
> 
> Is there a particular reason why the cmake build system does not work 
> for you?
> 

Hi David,

it's just that I am more used to autotools, and I tend to use that when
available, but I can use cmake to build fluidsynth with no problems.

So, at least for me, it is fine if you only want to support one build
system.

Regards,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?