[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:50:35 +0100 (CET) |
> I had originally been using floating point to handle stretching and
> emboldening of glyphs, which for obvious reasons Werner didn't want.
> So, I used 1000 because it was easier to convert to and from
> percentage.
>
> I'm OK converting all this over to FT_Fixed, however I think it will
> make maintaining it more confusing and tedious.
Essentially, it's just a question of representation, not changing the
values themselves. Good comments help :-)
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/12/17
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/12/17
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/17
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/12/17
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/17
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/12/18
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/18
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/12/19
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/12/19
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/19
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/19
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/12/19
- Re: [ft-devel] New Infinality Release, Infinality, 2012/12/19