[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:22:54 -0400 |
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Kostya Serebryany <address@hidden> wrote:
> The data shows that ~500 out of ~1000 functions were never executed.
> ...
> If we ever get close to ~90% function coverage...
About 50% coverage actually sounds reasonable for a given font format.
For example, Freetype has 3 hinters for different fonts. Of course, we
do not use them together. It took a while before the Fuzzer
"discovered" CFF space. I might be totally off base here, but coverage
for a given font format would be more informative. FreeType supports a
large but limited number of font formats
http://freetype.org/freetype2/docs/index.html .
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Kostya Serebryany, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Kostya Serebryany, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Ben Wagner, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Kostya Serebryany, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Kostya Serebryany, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Kostya Serebryany, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08