Re: [ft-devel] More fuzzing for freetype2?

[Kostya Serebryany]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:

>> The current function used for the fuzzer doesn't cover GX stuff at
>> all.  We have to extend it step by step to get a better FreeType
>> coverage.
>
> Let's start from here.
> I think the more sustainable approach is to commit the target
> function into the FreeType git first.
> I'll then re-target the bot to use that file instead of my own.
> Once that works, one of the domain experts (i.e. not me :) will be
> able to add more stuff there.
> This way you will fully control what functionality is actually being
> fuzzed, and I will just monitor the infrastructure.
> Does that sounds reasonable?

Yep.  If you like, I can give you write access so that you can quickly
adjust the fuzzer function if necessary. 

If that works for you -- yes, please. 

 

And please resend the
function you are currently using for testing.

I will start from putting 

https://github.com/kcc/libfuzzer-example/blob/master/freetype-experiment/freetype2_fuzzer.cc

and 

https://github.com/kcc/libfuzzer-example/blob/master/freetype-experiment/run_inputs.cc

w/o significant changes into a separate dir.

Do you have a pre-commit code review process for this kind of changes? 

 

    Werner