freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on S


From: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on Solaris x64
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 22:35:14 +0900 (JST)

Dear Suzuki san,

Oh, it is my fault.
It is has to be
#if !defined(__SUNPRO_C)
instead of
#ifndef __SUNPRO_C
?

Regards,

--- Kiyoshi


----- Original Message -----
From: suzuki toshiya <address@hidden>
To: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <address@hidden>
Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Date: 2018/5/3, Thu 21:52
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on Solaris x64

Dear Kanazawa-san,

BTW, I want to ask one of my question, just for curious.

suzuki toshiya wrote:
>> diff -ur ../freetype-2.9.1.orig/builds/unix/configure.raw ./builds/unix/configure.raw
>> --- ../freetype-2.9.1.orig/builds/unix/configure.raw    2018-05-01 19:35:09.000000000 +0000
>> +++ ./builds/unix/configure.raw 2018-05-03 17:27:54.383361566 +0000
>> @@ -313,7 +313,9 @@
>>  #
>>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([for -fvisibility=hidden compiler flag])
>>  orig_CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
>> +#ifndef __SUNPRO_C
>>  CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility=hidden"
>> +#endif
>>  AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([],[])],
>>                    AC_MSG_RESULT(yes),
>>                    CFLAGS="${orig_CFLAGS}"
>
> Excuse me, these changes for autotools look quite different from the syntax of
> autoconf, it looks like C preprocessor. Have you ever resolved similar problem
> by such patch for autoconf files?

Regards,
mpsuzuki




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]