Re: [ft-devel] FT_Done_MM_Var + FT_Library

[armin]

Thanks for the explanation :)

> the most natural choice was `FT_Library'.

I see.  Judging from an API user's perspective (and from a rather special
angle, maybe not THE standard usage) I think I would've preferred to rather
use an `FT_Face' as additional parameter instead of `FT_Library' since I
need that `FT_Face' anyways to get `FT_MM_Var' from `FT_Get_MM_Var' in first
place.  Further, it would create some kind of parameter symmetry between
getting + freeing `FT_MM_Var'.  This is highly biased of course.

Armin