[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver.
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver. |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jul 2018 23:39:05 +0200 (CEST) |
> ==5604== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==5604== definitely lost: 80 bytes in 2 blocks
> ==5604== indirectly lost: 45,388 bytes in 129 blocks
BTW, why are you allocating so much memory blocks? `ftexample.c'
asks for a single character, I thus expect that the GF driver loads
only a single glyph...
Werner
- [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/08
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver.,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/09
Re: [ft-devel] Updates for gf driver., Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/09