Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Bug #35790 (fop related) and the way of fixing it

[Karl Goetz]

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, 21:34:00 LHST, Marek Buras <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:54:36PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > If you could double check and make sure there is an explicit licence
> > statement - pd or not - that would be excellent. Would be embarassing
> > to make the package not free by mistake :)
> > 
> 
> I couldn't find any licensing information about this file (besides the
> comment inside it), but I've sent an e-mail to Graeme Gill - the author
> - asking about it and permission to use it.
> 
> > As long as the profiles are under a compatible licence you should be
> > fine. Note that being a repack it'll need the +fsdg suffix and the
> > copyright info updated with your changes.
> 
> What kind of copyright information should it be? Is something like this:
> ---------- 8< -----------
> Files: /path/to/this/sRGB.icm
> License: Public domain (if it's PD indeed)
>   This file has been downloaded from ...
> ---------- 8< -----------
> 

in the licence bit include the email from upstream where they say its pd, 
otherwise pretty muvh that :)