[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert upd

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:37:25 +1000

On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 08:40, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:01:30AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> Except that personal replies along with list replies is considered
> >> redundant by many.
> >
> >IF you want that argument to hold water, we should all go out and buy
> >Windows XP and get rid of this minority Unix thing.
> Apples and oranges, son.  If a frooble eats X, obviously a friggle
> should eat Y, right?

Sorry, Tom, I'm going to throw a last few, gasping replies into this

Jonathan, that's crap.

The argument I was drawing an analogy with was "The number of users
using X is greater than that using Y, therefore behaviour friendly to X
is the way to go.", for X=list-ignorant MUA's, and Y=list-aware MUA's.

No frooble->friggle sleight of hand here.

GPG key available at: <>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]