[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
archive registration (was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2)
From: |
Doran Moppert |
Subject: |
archive registration (was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:33:00 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:03:25PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> [*] See address@hidden/tla-tools--devo--0/tla-file-log'.
> (btw, do people find this notation for a particular file in an arch
> archive intuitive? I mean `the file called tla-file-log in the arch
> revision address@hidden/tla-tools--devo--0')
Speaking for myself, yes: the arch namespace makes sense to me like this.
In my mind the -- could be as easily exchanged for : / or any number of
characters, the important thing is the (location)(item)(path) syntax.
But to bring up a chestnut: where is address@hidden published? It's
infuriating having the archive identifier but no way to map it to a physical
location ...
NB- yes, I can get it from aderuwe's mirror, but that doesn't help me find
the canonical source any more. Alexander, can you please bring back the
page which displayed the original URLs?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs *huge* memory usage, John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], Robert Collins, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Jonas Diemer, 2003/09/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/09/11